DEI Training Is Not, per se, Illegal 2.12.2025
February 12, 2025Still Wondering What “Illegal DEI” Means? Loutel Has the Answers
March 20, 2025In a critical decision in favor of the Constitution, a federal judge has ruled against certain provisions of the administration’s executive orders aimed at dismantling diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. This ruling is a win not just for DEI efforts but for fundamental constitutional principles that protect free speech and due process.
The Blocked Provisions
The court struck down the following provisions of the executive orders:
- Termination of Equity-Related Grants and Contracts – Directing all executive agencies to cancel any grants or contracts deemed “equity-related.”
- Mandatory Anti-DEI Certification – Requiring contractors and grantees to certify, under the threat of False Claims Act enforcement, that they do not operate any programs promoting DEI that allegedly violate federal antidiscrimination laws.
- Federal Enforcement Against DEI Programs – Directing the Attorney General to investigate and take enforcement action against private-sector DEI initiatives deemed to be “illegal discrimination and preferences.”
Why the Court Ruled Against These Provisions
The court found that these provisions violated both the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment:
- Due Process Violation: The court emphasized, in order to ensure due process, laws must be clear so individuals and organizations know how to comply. The executive orders failed this standard because they provided no clear definitions for key terms such as “DEI,” “equity-related,” or “illegal discrimination or preferences.” Without clear guidelines, federal contractors and grantees were left in legal limbo, unsure whether their work would be considered unlawful.
- Free Speech Violation: The First Amendment prohibits the government from using funding as a means to suppress speech. The executive orders sought to deter DEI programs and principles simply because the administration disagreed with them—a classic case of viewpoint discrimination. The court ruled that the government cannot impose broad restrictions on speech in this manner.
What This Means for Companies
For now, organizations can continue their DEI programs without fear of violating federal law. However, given the political landscape, it is likely that the administration will appeal the ruling or introduce new policies targeting DEI. Companies should stay informed and prepared, ensuring their DEI initiatives remain strong and legally sound while monitoring further legal developments.
This decision reaffirms the importance of protecting diversity, equity, and inclusion— not just as business imperatives but as core values upheld by our constitutional rights. Let’s continue the work of building inclusive workplaces where everyone can thrive. Loutel is an employment law and business strategy firm that optimizes people and culture while minimizing legal risk. We are here to help your organization navigate the changing and complex landscape around DEI.
